Guild Wars Forums - GW Guru
 
 

Go Back   Guild Wars Forums - GW Guru > Forest of True Sight > Technician's Corner

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Dec 30, 2006, 11:59 PM // 23:59   #1
Pre-Searing Cadet
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Advertisement

Disable Ads
Default Performance Question.

Ok guys, so my question is what kind of performance [FPS] should I be getting with the fallowing rig? Graphics settings of your choice but no Anti-Aliasing.

CPU: AMD 3500+ 2.2Ghz Socket 939
Graphics Card: GeForce4 MX 440 64mb
RAM: 2X 512mb [1024mb] Duel-Channel DDR1

Thanks for your reply and the reason why I ask is because this is my bros old computer and he says he used to run the game fine on high graphics in PvP but I start lagging out on low graphics.

Sincerely,
A confused gamer.
APIOQM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 31, 2006, 12:22 AM // 00:22   #2
Ascalonian Squire
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Profession: N/W
Default

graphics card is an agp 4* , and pretty low end .
Zinger burger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 31, 2006, 12:34 AM // 00:34   #3
Pre-Searing Cadet
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Default

Is this why? Would a GeForce 5200 be any better?
APIOQM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 31, 2006, 12:44 AM // 00:44   #4
Jungle Guide
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Default

I don't even know if you can run it with that...
Gimme Money Plzkthx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 31, 2006, 12:47 AM // 00:47   #5
Pre-Searing Cadet
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Default

Yikes... well I'll be getting a 7800GT in a month anyways so I think I can hold off:P
APIOQM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 31, 2006, 01:12 AM // 01:12   #6
Frost Gate Guardian
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: NJ, USA
Guild: Dragons Will Eat Your [Face]
Profession: R/Mo
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gimme Money Plzkthx
I don't even know if you can run it with that...
You can i run it with it. Sucks, but its possible.
EatMoreCarbs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 31, 2006, 01:18 AM // 01:18   #7
Wilds Pathfinder
 
MegaMouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: south mississippi
Guild: Warriors Of Melos WOM
Profession: E/N
Default

Although your card is on the low end of the spectrum you should see pretty respectable frame rates in the range of 20-30 if your settings are turned down. I get 45+ FPS on my laptop and it has an ATI Radeon Express 200M onboard for comparison. Thast is with the settings at their lowest though. If I try to crank them up my frame rates bottom out. Just turn down the graphics settings and you will be fine.

Mega Mouse
MegaMouse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 06, 2008, 08:54 AM // 08:54   #8
Academy Page
 
NathanMurray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Guild: No Guild Yet Starting Fresh
Profession: N/
Default

Can I ask how good a Ge force FX 5700 is ? I'm curious becuase is it really good or really crap or in the middle. Honestly I'm upgrading becuase my card had to be removed becuase it shorted. Or I might just buy another I don't know.
NathanMurray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 06, 2008, 09:01 AM // 09:01   #9
Jungle Guide
 
Biostem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NathanMurray
Can I ask how good a Ge force FX 5700 is ? I'm curious becuase is it really good or really crap or in the middle. Honestly I'm upgrading becuase my card had to be removed becuase it shorted. Or I might just buy another I don't know.
The Geforce FX series is a couple years old now. Depending upon yoru budget and what your machine can handle, you're going to be better off w/ a Geforce 7000 or 8000 series. Also, generally speaking, you are better off getting a higher-end model of a lower series; a 7900 is much better than an 8400, for instance. PCI Express is also going to be faster than AGP.

Still, remember that GW is basically from 2005, and even w/ the updates since then, the card the OP mentioned should run the game decently. My laptop, which has a crummy shared-memory video accelerator can run it at 30FPS on the lowest settings...
Biostem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 06, 2008, 08:30 PM // 20:30   #10
Grotto Attendant
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by APIOQM
Graphics Card: GeForce4 MX 440 64mb
I've got a laptop with that card, and it's very hard pressed to play the game at all. It worked poorly but passably for Prophecies, but it just can't keep up with Nightfall.
Chthon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 06, 2008, 08:45 PM // 20:45   #11
Desert Nomad
 
iridescentfyre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Profession: W/
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Biostem
My laptop, which has a crummy shared-memory video accelerator can run it at 30FPS on the lowest settings...
You actually might be better off. The MX440 was the very bottom-end version of the Geforce 4 series--it offered performance only a little better than the Geforce 2. Even 6 years ago when it was released, it struggled in games. Even today many modern games list the Geforce 4 series as supported, followed immediately by (Except MX440.)
iridescentfyre is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Share This Forum!  
 
 
           

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:35 AM // 08:35.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
jQuery(document).ready(checkAds()); function checkAds(){if (document.getElementById('adsense')!=undefined){document.write("_gaq.push(['_trackEvent', 'Adblock', 'Unblocked', 'false',,true]);");}else{document.write("